Unresolved Peaks |
|
|
Unresolved Peaks The following data is extracted from three experiments performed by scientists at the R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute.
Next, comparisons of the responses between a UV detector and the PDR-Chiral Advanced Laser Polarimeter were made at reasonably good chromatographic resolution (Rs = 1.4). The following example indicates that with good resolution the UV detector has a better MMQ than the laser polarimeter.
However, in the following separations (shown below), as the resolution degrades, the detection limit for the polarimeter improves relative to that of the UV detector. The first set of chromatograms are at a resolution of 0.8 while the second set are at 0.4.
In the two tables below we have provided a summary of the correlation coefficients for the Chiral and UV detectors' responses, respectively. From this data, as expected, we see that using peak area will offer better quantitation than simply using peak height. And this is true for both detectors.
In summary, the data presented above clearly shows that the PDR-Chiral Advanced Laser Polarimeter, when used as a screening tool, can save valuable time and money by eliminating time-consuming chromatographic runs to achieve baseline resolution during method development. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||